Skip main navigation

Military Health System

Hurricane Milton & Hurricane Helene

Emergency procedures are in place in multiple states due to Hurricane Milton & Hurricane Helene. >>Learn More

Clinically Diagnosed Sunburn Among Active Component Service Members, U.S. Armed Forces, 2014–2022

Image of 3SkinExam. A significant cause of skin cancer is excessive UVR exposure, often in the form of repeated sunburn.

Sunburn affects U.S. military mission readiness, from clothing and gear discomfort, to infection and dehydration risk due to skin barrier breakdown and fluid loss.1 Depending on a service member’s military occupation, ultraviolet radiation exposure will vary, as seen with higher incidences of sunburn in recruits, aircraft and aircraft-related occupations, and infantry.1 Clinically, sunburn is classified and managed within two main categories: mild-moderate and severe.2 Electronic health record sunburn documentation is determined by International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision diagnosis codes that classify sunburn as sunburn of first degree, second degree, third degree, or unspecified. Sunburn of first degree (superficial burn) only affects the outer layer of the skin (epidermis), manifesting in mild to moderate erythema without blistering. Sunburn of second degree (partial thickness burn) affects both the epidermis and part of the dermis, resulting in erythema with blistering, with or without edema. Sunburn of third degree (full thickness burn) affects the epidermis and dermis, and occasionally the underlying bones, muscles, and tendons.

A significant cause of skin cancer is excessive UVR exposure, often in the form of repeated sunburn.3 Among U.S. military service members, non-melanoma skin cancers are the most frequently diagnosed cancer.4,5 Additionally, a recent Department of Defense report found that U.S. military aircrew had an 87% higher rate of melanoma, and aviation support personnel (ground crew) had a 9% higher rate of melanoma, compared to the general U.S. population.6

A 2014 MSMR report documented 19,172 incident cases of clinically-diagnosed sunburn among active component service members of the U.S. military from January 2002 to December 2013.1 Incidence rates were higher among women, non-Hispanic White service members, and those in younger age groups. Additionally, incidence was also higher for those in the Marine Corps and Army, as well as enlisted members, and recruits.1 This report describes recent frequencies and rates of clinically-diagnosed sunburn among active component service members.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study covered a surveillance period from January 1, 2014 to September 30, 2022 and included all ACSM of the U.S. Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps. Data were derived from the Defense Medical Surveillance System, which is maintained by the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division. DMSS documents ambulatory care encounters and hospitalizations in fixed military and civilian (if reimbursed through the Military Health System) treatment facilities worldwide.

Outcome of sunburn was identified through inpatient and outpatient medical encounters containing an ICD-9 code of 692.71 (sunburn of first degree), 692.76 (sunburn of second degree), 692.77 (sunburn of third degree), or an ICD-10 code of L55.0 (sunburn of first degree), L55.1 (sunburn of second degree), L55.2 (sunburn of third degree), or L55.9 (sunburn, unspecified), in the first or second diagnostic position. The transition between ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes, in 2015, occurred during the study’s surveillance period.

An individual was classified as a new case of sunburn if at least 30 days passed since the documentation of a previous sunburn-associated medical encounter. Incidence of sunburn was calculated per 100,000 person-years (p-yrs). Negative binomial regression calculated incidence rate ratios for occupation categories, adjusting for sex, age, and race and ethnicity.

Results

Table 1 provides the total incident case counts and crude incidence rates of clinically-diagnosed sunburn among ACSM during the 9-year surveillance period. Over half of the cases were first degree sunburn (n=6,244; 54.5%), and almost all cases were diagnosed in the ambulatory setting (n=12,029; 99.95%). During the 9-year surveillance period, most, 97.1% (n=11,687), reported cases had only 1 diagnosed sunburn.

Table outlines total incident case counts and crude incidence rates of clinically-diagnosed sunburn among ACSM from 2014-2022.

The incidence rate of sunburn diagnosis was higher among women compared to men. Non-Hispanic White service members had the highest rate compared to other races and ethnicities. The three youngest age groups, under 20 years, 20-24, and 25-29 years of age, had the highest incidence rates of sunburn diagnosis, with rates decreasing with increasing age until 45 years of age. The Marine Corps and Army had the highest rates among the services. Recruits had a significantly higher sunburn incidence compared to non-recruit enlisted service members and officers.

The annual total sunburn incidence rates, which varied annually, increased overall 6.4% from 2014 (100.3 per 100,000) through 2022 (106.8 per 100,000). Of the 12,035 cases of sunburn, 5,542 occurred in June (46.0%), more than in any other month (data not shown). Ten military installations/regions accounted for 36% of all sunburns during the surveillance  period. The highest overall counts were in Okinawa, Japan (n=513) and San Diego, CA (n=510), followed closely by Fort Moore (formerly Benning), GA (n=468), and Fort Leonard Wood, MO (n=454) (data not shown).

Table 2 provides the crude and adjusted rate ratios for the association between occupational category and sunburn. The pilot/air crew category had the lowest crude and adjusted incidence rate of sunburn diagnosis.

Table 2 provides the crude and adjusted rate ratios for the association between occupational category and sunburn.

Discussion

Compared to the prior MSMR report, the incidence of clinically-diagnosed sunburn among ACSM decreased 15.9% from 2002-2013 to 2014-2022 (from 124.8 cases per 100,000 p-yrs to 105.0 cases per 100,000 p-yrs).1 In both studies, women demonstrated a higher rate of sunburn diagnosis. Epidemiological data of the general U.S. population suggest that women are less likely to report frequent sunburn and are more likely to implement sunburn prevention measures.7,8,9 According to National Cancer Institute statistics, however, reported sunburn for women differs from  men by age, with younger women (aged 18-24) accounting for a higher proportion of sunburns than men in the same age group.10 The majority of ACSM are under 25 years of age, which could partially explain the higher incidence of sunburn among women described in this study.

Similar to the 2014 MSMR report, non-Hispanic White service members and younger age groups had higher diagnosed sunburn rates, which is consistent with the general U.S. population.7 The current study found that pilot/air crew had the lowest rate of sunburn diagnosis, both before and after adjustment for potential confounders, which suggests that other factors such as differences in health care utilization or sunburn prevention measures may influence lower incidence of sunburn diagnoses. 

One limitation of this study is outcome misclassification bias for sunburn diagnosis based upon health care utilization. This report likely underestimates the true rate of sunburn, as only individuals with more serious burns are likely to present for medical care. Additionally, the introduction of the ICD-10 code of “unspecified” may limit ascertainment of burn severity, potentially affecting accurate surveillance. A second limitation of this study is that the data could not differentiate sunburn during work hours versus non-work hours, challenging associations of occupation with sunburn risk.

Sunburn affects military readiness by removing service members from duty while their burns heal, affecting both garrison and combat missions. As a risk factor for future skin cancer, sunburn is a longitudinal concern for both the public health sector and the military due to the health care costs and time involved in management of melanoma and NMSC.11,12 Emphasis on prevention should continue.

Sunburn is likely multifactorial, from limited access to sunscreen, to its lack of use, variable encouragement of use by peers or leadership, operational time constraints, and low prioritization or understanding of the long-term effects of sun damage.12,13 Mitigation strategies can include pre-deployment or seasonal health promotion focused on increasing use of available sun-protective measures, including sunscreen, sunglasses, headgear, shade structures, and modified outdoor training times to early morning or later day/early evening.

Survey analysis of military-specific populations could help quantify incidence of sunburn that is more specific than clinical diagnoses, and could quantify occurrence of unreported sunburn. Survey research could evaluate behavioral practices, such as use of preventive measures, location and timing (on- or off-duty) of sunburn, and inquiry about unreported burns, which may better inform sunburn-reduction strategies.

Author Affiliations

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD: LT Van Airsdale; Defense Health Agency, Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division: Dr. Stahlman, Ms. Hiban, CAPT Wells.

Disclaimer

The opinions and assertions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy nor position of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences or the Department of Defense. LT Van Airsdale is a military service member. This work was prepared as part of official duties. Title 17, U.S.C., §105 provides that copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the U.S. Government. Title 17, U.S.C., §101 defines a U.S. Government work as a work prepared by a military Service member or employee of the U.S. Government as part of that person’s official duties.

References

  1. Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. Sunburn among active component service members, U.S. Armed Forces, 2002–2013. MSMR. 2014;21(7):2-6.
  2. Young AR and Tewari A. Sunburn. UpToDate. Updated Aug. 4, 2022. Accessed Oct. 10, 2023. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/sunburn
  3. Guerra KC, Crane JS. Sunburn. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Accessed Apr. 4, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534837
  4. Lee T, Taubman SB, Williams VF. Incident diagnoses of non-melanoma skin cancer, active component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2005-2014. MSMR. 2016;23(12):2-6.
  5. Mabila S, Dreyer E. Surveillance snapshot: the top 10 incident cancers among active component service members, 2018-2022. MSMR. 2023;30(9):17.
  6. U.S. Department of Defense. Phase 1-a—Study on the Incidence of Cancer Diagnosis and Mortality Among Military Aviators and Aviation Support Personnel. Jan. 2023.
  7. Braun HA, Adler CH, Goodman M, Yeung H. Sunburn frequency and risk and protective factors: a cross-sectional survey. Dermatol Online J. 2021;27(4).
  8. McKenzie C, Nahm WJ, Kearney CA, Zampella JG. Sun-protective behaviors and sunburn among US adults. Arch Dermatol Res. 2023:1-10. doi:10.1007/s00403-023-02547-z
  9. Reuter NP, Bower M, Scoggins CR, Martin RC, McMasters KM, Chagpar AB. The lower incidence of melanoma in women may be related to increased preventative behaviors. Am J Surg. 2010;200(6):765-769. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.06.007
  10. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Cancer Trends Progress Report/Sunburn. Updated Aug. 2023. Accessed Oct. 13, 2023. https://progressreport.cancer.gov/prevention/sunburn
  11. Kao SYZ, Ekwueme DU, Holman DM, et al. Economic burden of skin cancer treatment in the USA: an analysis of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Data, 2012–2018. Cancer Causes Control. 2023;34:205-212. doi:10.1007/s10552-022-01644-0
  12. Rosenberg A, Cho S. We can do better at protecting our service members from skin cancer. Mil Med. 2022;187:311-313. doi:10.1093/milmed/usac198
  13. Powers JG, Patel NA, Powers EM, Mayer JE, Stricklin GP, Geller AC. Skin cancer risk factors and preventative behaviors among United States military veterans deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135(11):2871-2873. doi:10.1038/jid.2015.238

You also may be interested in...

Article
Sep 1, 2022

Evaluation of the MSMR Surveillance Case Definition for Incident Cases of Hepatitis C

U.S. Marine Corps Lance Cpl. Angel Alvarado, a combat graphics specialist, donates blood for the Armed Services Blood Program (ASBP).

The validity of military hepatitis C virus (HCV) surveillance data is uncertain due to the potential for misclassification introduced when using administrative databases for surveillance purposes. The objectives of this study were to assess the validity of the surveillance case definition used by the Medical Surveillance Monthly Report (MSMR) for HCV ...

Report
Aug 1, 2022

MSMR Vol. 29 No. 08 - August 2022

.PDF | 822.83 KB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Surveillance trends for SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens among U.S. Military Health System Beneficiaries, Sept. 27, 2020 – Oct. 2,2021; Establishment of SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance within the ...

Article
Aug 1, 2022

Brief Report: Pain and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Screening Outcomes Among Military Personnel Injured During Combat Deployment.

U.S. Air Force Airman 1st Class Miranda Lugo, right, 18th Operational Medical Readiness Squadron mental health technician and Guardian Wingman trainer, and Maj. Joanna Ho, left, 18th OMRS director of psychological health, discuss the suicide prevention training program, Guardian Wingman, at Kadena Air Base, Japan, Aug. 20, 2021. Guardian Wingman aims to promote wingman culture and early help-seeking behavior. (U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Anna Nolte)

The post-9/11 U.S. military conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan lasted over a decade and yielded the most combat casualties since the Vietnam War. While patient survivability increased to the high­est level in history, a changing epidemiology of combat injuries emerged whereby focus shifted to addressing an array of long-term sequelae, including ...

Article
Aug 1, 2022

Musculoskeletal Injuries During U.S. Air Force Special Warfare Training Assessment and Selection, Fiscal Years 2019–2021.

U.S. Air Force Capt. Hopkins, 351st Special Warfare Training Squadron, Instructor Flight commander and Chief Combat Rescue Officer (CRO) instructor, conducts a military free fall equipment jump from a DHC-4 Caribou aircraft in Coolidge, Arizona, July 17, 2021. Hopkins is recognized as the 2020 USAF Special Warfare Instructor Company Grade Officer of the Year for his outstanding achievement from January 1 to December 31, 2020.

Musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries are costly and the leading cause of medical visits and disability in the U.S. military.1,2 Within training envi­ronments, MSK injuries may lead to a loss of training, deferment to a future class, or voluntary disenrollment from a training pipeline, all of which are impediments to maintaining full levels of manpower and ...

Report
Jul 1, 2022

MSMR Vol. 29 No. 07 - July 2022

.PDF | 1.67 MB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Surveillance trends for SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens among U.S. Military Health System Beneficiaries, Sept. 27, 2020 – Oct. 2,2021; Establishment of SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance within the ...

Article
Jul 1, 2022

Brief Report: Phase I Results Using the Virtual Pooled Registry Cancer Linkage System (VPR-CLS) for Military Cancer Surveillance.

A patient at Naval Hospital Pensacola prepares to have a low-dose computed tomography test done to screen for lung cancer. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among men and women. Early detection can lower the risk of dying from this disease. (U.S. Navy photo by Jason Bortz)

The Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division, as part of its surveillance mission, periodically conducts studies of cancer incidence among U.S. military service members. However, service members are likely lost to follow-up from the Department of Defense cancer registry and Military Health System data sets after leaving service and during periods of ...

Article
Jul 1, 2022

Establishment of SARS-CoV-2 Genomic Surveillance Within the Military Health System During 1 March–31 December 2020.

Dr. Peter Larson loads an Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencer in support of COVID-19 sequencing assay development at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Maryland. (Photo by John Braun Jr., USAMRIID.)

This report describes SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance conducted by the Department of Defense (DOD) Global Emerging Infections Surveillance Branch and the Next-Generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Consortium (NGSBC) in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Samples and sequence data were from SARS-CoV-2 infections occurring among Military Health System ...

Article
Jul 1, 2022

Suicide Behavior Among Heterosexual, Lesbian/Gay, and Bisexual Active Component Service Members in the U.S. Armed Forces.

  The DOD’s theme for National Suicide Prevention Month is “Connect to Protect: Support is Within Reach.” Deployments, COVID-19 restrictions, and the upcoming winter season are all stressors and potential causes for depression that could lead to suicidal ideations. Options are available to individuals who are having thoughts of suicide and those around them (Photo by Kirk Frady, Regional Health Command Europe).

Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals are at a particularly high risk for suicidal behavior in the general population of the United States. This study aims to determine if there are differences in the frequency of lifetime suicide ideation and suicide attempts between heterosexual, lesbian/gay, and bisexual service members in the active ...

Article
Jul 1, 2022

Surveillance Trends for SARS-CoV-2 and Other Respiratory Pathogens Among U.S. Military Health System Beneficiaries, 27 September 2020–2 October 2021.

Staff Sgt. Misty Poitra and Senior Airman Chris Cornette, 119th Medical Group, collect throat swabs during voluntary COVID-19 rapid drive-thru testing for members of the community while North Dakota Army National Guard Soldiers gather test-subject data in the parking lot of the FargoDome in Fargo, N.D., May 3, 2020. The guardsmen partnered with the N.D. Department of Health and other civilian agencies in the mass-testing efforts of community volunteers. (U.S. Air National Guard photo by Chief Master Sgt. David H. Lipp)

Respiratory pathogens, such as influenza and adenovirus, have been the main focus of the Department of Defense Global Respiratory Pathogen Surveillance Program (DoDGRPSP) since 1976.1. However, DoDGRPSP also began focusing on SARS-CoV-2 when COVID-19 was declared a pandemic illness in early March 2020.2. Following this declaration, the DOD quickly ...

Article
Jun 1, 2022

Hospitalizations, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

The hospitalization rate in 2021 was 48.0 per 1,000 person-years (p-yrs), the second lowest rate of the most recent 10 years. For hospitalizations limited to military facilities, the rate in 2021 was the lowest for the entire period. As in prior years, the majority (71.2%) of hospitalizations were associated with diagnoses in the categories of mental ...

Article
Jun 1, 2022

Ambulatory Visits, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

In 2021, the overall numbers and rates of active component service member ambulatory care visits were the highest of any of the last 10 years. Most categories of illness and injury showed modest increases in numbers and rates. The proportions of ambulatory care visits that were accomplished via telehealth encounters fell to under 15% in 2021, compared ...

Skip subpage navigation
Refine your search
Last Updated: December 01, 2023
Follow us on Instagram Follow us on LinkedIn Follow us on Facebook Follow us on X Follow us on YouTube Sign up on GovDelivery