Preserving Sight to Fight by Ensuring Effective Military Eye Protection

Image of Preserving Sight to Fight by Ensuring Effective Military Eye Protection. The military’s Authorized Protective Eyewear List, commonly referred to as the APEL, ensures that military protective eyewear meets necessary ballistic impact criteria. (DHA Public Health graphic illustration by Rachel Stershic)

Despite the continued development of munitions that create new types of blast fragments that can injure eyes, evidence indicates decreasing rates of eye injuries in the military. This is largely due to the Department of Defense’s efforts to ensure that service members wear protective eyewear that meets necessary ballistic-impact criteria through the development and continued updating of the Authorized Protective Eyewear List, commonly referred to as the APEL.

“The APEL was developed in 2006 to address high and increasing numbers of battlefield eye injuries,” said Dr. Robert Kang, optometrist for the Defense Health Agency Tri-Service Vision Conservation and Readiness Branch. “The APEL is updated every two years to allow for new developments in technology and user requirements.”

What is the APEL?

The APEL is a Qualified Product List of the specific commercially produced-protective eyewear that is available in spectacles and goggles and has been tested to meet stringent military ballistic fragmentation requirements. The APEL is overseen by the Military Combat Eyewear Protection, or MCEP, program which is managed by the Army’s Program Executive Office, known as PEO Soldier.

APEL eyewear meets both civilian occupational and additional military safety requirements for splash, radiation, dust, mist, impact, and ultraviolet or UV hazards, as well as for ballistic resistance.

In addition to ballistic and UV protection performance standards, U.S. military standards are routinely updated for the following performance standards: anti-scratch and optical clarity, fit, chemical resistance, and stability properties to minimize any negative impact on the eyewear’s performance when exposed to a range of temperatures or levels of humidity.

“The testing is robust so that we know we are offering the best protection to our warfighters,” said Kang. “Especially important though, because the products are developed by commercial manufacturers, is that the eyewear incorporates comfort and popular aesthetic qualities. This has been the key to ensuring that soldiers obtain and wear APEL eyewear.”

Current APEL products include Rapid Light Adaptive Eyewear, or RLAE, and cold weather specific eyewear with enhanced anti-fogging features. RLAE lenses, available in spectacles and goggles, can transition between light and dark in less than one second, in either auto or manual mode. The RLAE helps accommodate a sudden change in light condition, an important feature in modern urban warfare.

“We have recently been supporting the evaluation of tinted lenses for those who find the current option of either clear or dark sun lenses too limiting,” said Kang. “Different mission environments and individual preferences indicate that allowing options in the degree or color of tints may improve performance and user acceptance.”

To address eye hazards from the increasing number of powerful lasers on the modern battlefield, a new generation of laser eye protection devices has also been developed, he said. Laser eye protection will be available to units with specific needs.

APEL-qualified eyewear carries the APEL logo on the eyewear itself. Eyewear that does not carry the APEL logo is not authorized for use by U.S. armed forces. It does not matter if the eyewear meets the American National Standards Institute standard, or what a manufacturer claims, or if a manufacturer has had other items on the APEL. It also does not matter if the Exchange or Military Clothing Sales Stores sell the eyewear. What matters is that the protective eyewear must bear the approved APEL logo.

“The APEL logo lets leaders know that personnel are wearing authorized protection,” said Kang.

What if I Have a Medical Prescription for Vision Correction?

“About half of all soldiers require a prescription for vision correction or to improve visual performance,” said Kang. “Many APEL items, including both spectacles and goggles, are compatible with the Universal Prescription Lens Carrier, or UPLC, for those who require a medical prescription for visual correction.”

By checking the information on the, personnel can learn which eyewear is UPLC compatible. Service members who require a prescription should use a military optometry clinic to obtain the proper prescription lens carriers for their APEL eyewear.

Deployed service members may also obtain a replacement prescription through the Government Eyewear System known as G-Eyes.

How Can I Obtain Eyewear from the APEL?

“A service member can pick a product of their choice from the APEL based on style, function, comfort, and mission requirements,” said Kang. “Options include spectacle and goggle formats.”

Many military clothing sales stores carry APEL items. Units can also order APEL eyewear through the supply system with the eyewear’s corresponding National Stock Number, known as its NSN. Eyewear NSNs are listed on both the PEO APEL website and APEL poster. NSNs for replacement components are also available. View the spare parts listing per eyewear by selecting the individual eyewear from the eyewear webpage.

Also critical to some units and personnel is laser eye protection, known as LEP.

LEP-specific APEL is only available from PEO Soldier. Units and individuals should contact the program office to obtain LEP.

When Should I Get New Eyewear?

To optimize visual capabilities, service members should:

  • Check eyewear for damage and consider wear and tear. Typical use for protective eyewear lenses is six months. Scratched lenses may prevent clear vision and may not provide the necessary ballistics or anti-fog protection.
  • Stay up to date with the latest developments in APEL®. The current APEL was last updated in June 2022, which means another update is expected later in 2024.
  • Get regular eye examinations and prescription updates.
    • How old is your MCEP insert? If it is more than two years old, have your eyes checked to ensure you have a current prescription that will meet your visual needs. New technology under development may allow prescription correction to be integrated in the protective lens, i.e., no need for inserts. If successful, this innovation will significantly improve vision and comfort to those service members who currently depend on prescription inserts.
    • Are you seeing 20/20? Even if you conduct tasks well, you may not realize that a prescription lens could further enhance your vision and help you perform even better. Eye exams every one to two –may help determine if prescription eyewear can provide vision enhancement.

All active duty service members benefit from the DHA expertise that helps to ensure that APEL eyewear provides quality eye protection. Check out the various eye protection devices available.

You also may be interested in...

Report
Jan 1, 1997

MSMR Vol. 3 No. 3 – April 1997

.PDF | 197.74 KB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Editorial Comment; Hospitalizations and non-effective days, 1996; Selected sentinel reportable diseases, March 1997; Selected sentinel reportable diseases, 2 year trends; Reportable sexually transmitted ...

Report
Jan 1, 1997

MSMR Vol. 3 No. 2 – March 1997

.PDF | 163.16 KB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Pneumonia among active duty soldiers 1990-1996; Selected notifiable conditions; Notifiable sexually transmitted diseases; Group A beta hemolytic streptococcus among trainees; Surveillance trends: ...

Report
Jan 1, 1997

MSMR Vol. 3 No. 7 – October 1997

.PDF | 208.96 KB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Selected sentinel reportable diseases, 2 year trends; Reportable sexually transmitted diseases, September 1997; Varicella among active duty soldiers; Selected sentinel reportable diseases, September 1997; ...

Report
Jan 1, 1997

MSMR Vol. 3 No. 1 – January 1997

.PDF | 343.76 KB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Selected notifiable conditions; Notifiable sexually transmitted diseases; Gastroenteritis outbreaks among military trainees; Surveillance trends: Hospitalization rates, Bosnia; Bosnia update: DNBI ...

Report
Jan 1, 1997

MSMR Vol. 3 No. 4 – June 1997

.PDF | 132.99 KB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Risk factor analysis (part I), hospitalizations, OJE; Selected sentinel reportable diseases, May 1997; Selected sentinel reportable diseases, 2 year trends; Reportable sexually transmitted diseases, May 1997; ...

Report
Jan 1, 1997

MSMR Vol. 3 No. 5 – July/August 1997

.PDF | 165.88 KB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Plasmodium vivax malaria of Korean origin, 1997; Selected sentinel reportable diseases, June 1997; Selected sentinel reportable diseases, 2 year trends; Reportable sexually transmitted diseases, June 1997; ...

Report
Jan 1, 1997

MSMR Vol. 3 No. 6 – September 1997

.PDF | 197.28 KB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Hyponatremia secondary to overhydration; Selected sentinel reportable diseases, August 1997; Selected sentinel reportable diseases, 2 year trends; Reportable sexually transmitted diseases, August 1997; ...

Report
Jan 1, 1996

MSMR Vol. 2 No. 1 – January 1996

.PDF | 134.17 KB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Cold Weather Injuries, Oct - Dec, 1995; Selected notifiable conditions; Notifiable sexually transmitted diseases; Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis – WRAMC; Surveillance Trends: CWI hospitalization rates; ...

Report
Jan 1, 1996

MSMR Vol. 2 No. 3 – March 1996

.PDF | 279.20 KB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Cutaneous Leishmaniasis, WRAMC; Selected notifiable conditions; Notifiable sexually transmitted diseases; Preliminary data: HEARS; Leprosy in a Navy family member, Ft Hood; Surveillance Trends: Hospitalization ...

Report
Jan 1, 1996

MSMR Vol. 2 No. 4 – April 1996

.PDF | 125.97 KB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Rash outbreaks, U.S. forces operating in Belgium; Selected notifiable conditions; Notifiable sexually transmitted diseases; Injuries and fitness in BCT units, FLW, MO; Surveillance trends: Hospitalization rates ...

Report
Jan 1, 1996

MSMR Vol. 2 No. 10 – December 1996

.PDF | 414.30 KB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Overview of military respiratory disease surveillance; Selected notifiable conditions; Notifiable sexually transmitted diseases; ARD surveillance among Army basic trainees; Air Force Influenza Surveillance ...

Report
Jan 1, 1996

MSMR Vol. 2 No. 9 – November 1996

.PDF | 106.69 KB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Shigella sonnei diarrheal outbreaks; Selected notifiable conditions; Notifiable sexually transmitted diseases; TB Skin Test Converters, Ft. Leavenworth; Surveillance trends: Hospitalization rates, Bosnia; ...

Report
Jan 1, 1996

MSMR Vol. 2 No. 7 – September 1996

.PDF | 107.12 KB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Rash illness outbreak among British Soldiers; Selected notifiable conditions; Notifiable sexually transmitted diseases; Leptospirosis - Tripler Army Medical Center; Surveillance trends: Hospitalization rates, ...

Report
Jan 1, 1996

MSMR Vol. 2 No. 6 – July 1996

.PDF | 150.06 KB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Hookworm Disease - Ft. Drum, NY; Selected notifiable conditions; Notifiable sexually transmitted diseases; Malaria Outbreak, Vincenza, Italy; Surveillance trends: Hospitalization rates, Bosnia; Bosnia update: ...

Report
Jan 1, 1996

MSMR Vol. 2 No. 8 – October 1996

.PDF | 158.75 KB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Vivax malaria in U.S. forces – Korea; Selected notifiable conditions; Notifiable sexually transmitted diseases; Diarrhea outbreak – Croatia; 1996-97 Influenza immunization guidelines; ARD surveillance update; ...

Refine your search